26 responses to “Boomerang”

1. Working Title: The Queen’s Evidence
   Setting: 1930s New York,
   Pitch:
   In 1930s New York, Eunice Carter, an African-American prosecutor, stands as a beacon of justice amidst the chaos of organized crime. Facing both the mafia’s intimidation and skepticism from her white male peers, Carter strategically employs the testimonies of exploited women to challenge the mob’s stronghold. As she navigates through smoke-filled Jazz clubs and gritty streets, crafting a groundbreaking trial through alliances and covert operations, Carter discovers a betrayal within her ranks—her closest ally is compromised, linked to the mafia. While her most trusted investigator is revealed to be the son of the mob boss, torn between family loyalty and moral justice. In this stark world of contrasts and hidden dangers, “The Queen’s Evidence” unfolds as a dramatic quest to redefine justice, where Carter’s legal acumen and resilience could either dismantle an empire of crime or cost her everything. This film rivals the intrigue of “Truth and Lies: The Last Gangster.”

2. Late deadline pushed to 5/31

3. It is expected that as the world continues to progress, art and it’s many forms of expression will continue to evolve as well. These AI tools are fascinating and exciting in the sense that they will provide people such as myself, with access to tools and resources that will help bring our stories to life in ways never seen before. Conversely, I believe that the threat of AI regarding our voices is minimal at best. Our creativity and storytelling are rich in soul and flavor in such a way that is nearly impossible to replicate authentically. Which is where I believe we shine in a different light. Nevertheless, the future looks promising!

4. All that info is important to know. I wasn’t aware that a software program broke down the script like that. I have to pay more attention to action blocks and make sure they stand alone.

5. This article was so beneficial for me. Thank you so much for the wealth of wisdom you provided us. I’m beyond grateful and thank you, David.

6. Super informative article. Thanks, David!

7. Opportunity often intersects with uncertainty in the entertainment industry. We must understand the intricacies of option agreements, negotiation points, and the pre-production processes. By equipping ourselves with this knowledge, we not only safeguard our creative visions but also assert our presence in an industry that historically has marginalized our voices. Thanks for the heads up, David.

8. Great article, David. I hadn’t really thought about Game Theory in regards to my work, and this gives me a fresh perspective to explore. I was thinking about how “Heat” is a good example of this dynamic. Pacino and De Niro play this cat and mouse game. They are not collaborators, but there is a professional level of respect and likeability between these two men. It’s an interesting dynamic because they both function as dual protagonists at times throughout the movie.

9. So many options to choose from. I don’t even know where to begin. Thanks, David. This is quite the list.

10. Thank you!

11. This example can be seen in the current wars, whether military or economic. And throughout history, even in the Bible. The tension between hero and antagonist gets more personal and naturally raises the stakes. Excellent examples, David. This idea should make all of our stories more engaging. Much appreciated.

12. This is an awesome tool to implement in our projects. This creates tension between characters as they make critical choices throughout our stories. Thanks, David.

13. Working Title: The Trial of Agent Bolden
    Setting: 1960’s America (Chicago, DC, Massachusets)
    Pitch:

    At a conference at Chicago’s McCormick Center on April 28, 1961, rookie Secret Service Agent and former Pinkerton Detective, Abraham Bolden, meets President John F. Kennedy. At the president’s request, Bolden is assigned to Kennedy’s security detail for 30 days as “the Jackie Robinson of the Secret Service.” He guards him at the White House and the president’s vacation home in Hyannis Port, Massachusetts, where he observes unprofessional behavior from some of his colleagues. Upon returning to Chicago, news of an assassination plot against the president in Chicago the coming November is cause for alarm. Bolden keeps up with the alleged plot via radio chatter on his official Secret Service scanner. After JFK’s assassination the following year, Bolden pivots to investigating gambling and counterfeit rings, rising to the top of his field. Suddenly, he is accused of a dubious plot to accept a bribe from one of the counterfeiter rings he’s helped arrest. Agent Bolden is fired from the Secret Service. After a mistrial with a judge biased against him, Bolden is convicted and sentenced to 6 years. While appealing the decision, Bolden works on an assembly line, insisting he was set up because he intended to report the misbehavior and racism of his fellow agents to the Warren Commission. A convicted counterfeiter who testified against Bolden admitted to being coached by Federal Agents. Regardless, Bolden’s imprisoned on conspiracy charges and serves 4 years with 2 years probation. Upon release, he revealed his knowledge of the Chicago JFK assassination plot to the House Select Committee on Assassinations between 1976-78. It later emerges that Chicago mobster “Handsome Johnny” Roselli was behind framing Bolden. This story involves elements of true crime, race relations, and historical conspiracies, all of which appeal to the 25-40 demographic.